FinOps
Where the money goes, what is wasted, and which commitments are worth making.
Runs today, on Google Cloud
Connect a Google Cloud project and this module reads it. Today that means:
- Disks attached to nothing
- Reserved addresses nobody is using
- Instances stopped and still costing
- Snapshots older than they need to be
It reads Google Cloud only, not AWS or Azure, and it does not track remediation. Everything further down this page is where the module is going, not what it does now. The wider review is work we do as an engagement — FinOps engagement.
Why this module exists
The cloud bill arrives monthly, aggregated, and too late to act on. By the time anyone asks why it rose, the change that caused it is three sprints back.
What it is being built to surface
Descriptions of intent. No findings exist yet, because nothing is connected yet.
Where the money goes
Spend attributed to teams and services, not just accounts.
Waste
Idle resources, orphaned volumes, oversized instances and forgotten environments.
Structural cost
Data transfer, NAT gateways and the architecture decisions that quietly bill forever.
Commitment position
Coverage and utilisation, and whether more commitment is actually warranted.
What the module covers
- Spend visibility and forecasting
- Waste, idle resources and rightsizing
- Kubernetes cost allocation
- Data transfer, NAT and commitment optimisation
Tell us what this would need to catch
We are designing this against real environments. If this is a problem you have, the fastest way to shape it is a conversation with the engineers building it.
Talk to an Engineer