%20--%3e%3cstyle%20type='text/css'%3e.cls-0%20{fill:%23FF9900;}%3c/style%3e%3cpath%20class='cls-0'%20d='m117.3%2084h-14.1l39.2-79h-24.8l-20.3%2041.7-20.5-41.7h-3.8l-20.3%2041.7-20.8-41.7h-24.3l41%2083.3h8.2l18.2-37.7%2018.3%2037.8h23.7v2.8h10.7v-10.5h-10.6v3.3h0.2zm3.3-74.7h15.2l-28.9%2057.1-7.2-14.9%2020.6-42.2h0.3zm-69.3%2074.9-37-75h15.1l20.8%2042.4-5.8%2011%204.1%201.6%2016.9-33.9%207.2%2015.7-18.4%2038.1-2.9%200.1zm44.5-0.1-28.2-58.9%207.4-14.8%2029.6%2060.8-6.1%2012.9c0%200.1-2.7%200-2.7%200zm27.9%200.6v2.8h-3.1v-2.8h3.1z'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
Compliance
Map what your systems do to what your auditors ask, without a spreadsheet marathon.
On the roadmap — not available yet
This module is in design. Nothing described below can be switched on today.
Why this module exists
Audit preparation turns into weeks of screenshots because the evidence lives in systems nobody has connected to the control framework.
What it is being built to surface
Descriptions of intent. No findings exist yet, because nothing is connected yet.
Control mapping
Technical state mapped to the controls you are assessed against.
Evidence from live systems
Collected from the systems themselves rather than assembled by hand.
Gaps and ownership
What is not met, and whose team owns closing it.
Audit-ready reporting
Output an auditor can read without translation.
What the module covers
- Control mapping across frameworks
- Evidence collection from live systems
- Gap tracking and ownership
- Audit-ready reporting
Tell us what this would need to catch
We are designing this against real environments. If this is a problem you have, the fastest way to shape it is a conversation with the engineers building it.
Talk to an Engineer