%20--%3e%3cstyle%20type='text/css'%3e.cls-0%20{fill:%23FF9900;}%3c/style%3e%3cpath%20class='cls-0'%20d='m117.3%2084h-14.1l39.2-79h-24.8l-20.3%2041.7-20.5-41.7h-3.8l-20.3%2041.7-20.8-41.7h-24.3l41%2083.3h8.2l18.2-37.7%2018.3%2037.8h23.7v2.8h10.7v-10.5h-10.6v3.3h0.2zm3.3-74.7h15.2l-28.9%2057.1-7.2-14.9%2020.6-42.2h0.3zm-69.3%2074.9-37-75h15.1l20.8%2042.4-5.8%2011%204.1%201.6%2016.9-33.9%207.2%2015.7-18.4%2038.1-2.9%200.1zm44.5-0.1-28.2-58.9%207.4-14.8%2029.6%2060.8-6.1%2012.9c0%200.1-2.7%200-2.7%200zm27.9%200.6v2.8h-3.1v-2.8h3.1z'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
Who we are and how we work
A cloud and AI engineering consultancy, registered in the Netherlands and working wherever the systems are. Small, senior, and narrow on purpose.
What we are not
Warqline is a small team of senior engineers, not a body shop and not a reseller. We are an official partner on two clouds — AWS and Google Cloud — and we do not claim to specialise in every other one. We hold no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification and say so on the Trust Center rather than leaving it ambiguous. If you need a hundred engineers next quarter, we are the wrong firm, and we would rather say that on this page than on the third call.
Why this exists
Two problems kept showing up in other people's cloud estates, and neither was a detection problem.
The first: security and cost tooling that reports thousands of findings, and engineering teams who have learned to ignore all of them. Nothing in that pipeline tells you which twelve matter this week. The second: a platform handed over by a consultancy that will never operate it, documented in a file nobody opens again, running until the first person who understood it leaves.
Warqline was built around both. The engineering work is done by people who stay to run it; the assurance platform exists to answer the "which twelve" question continuously rather than in a report. That is the whole idea, and the rest of this page is how it is carried out.
How we work
Five commitments, each of which costs us something. That is how you can tell they are real.
We operate what we build
Handing a platform to somebody who has never seen it is how institutional knowledge gets lost. The engineers who designed a system are the ones who run it afterwards, with your team still in the room.
The goal is a team that could take it back
Every engagement is aimed at leaving your engineers able to run what we built. That is the opposite of the incentive most consultancies have, and it is why training sits alongside delivery rather than after it.
Deep in a few areas rather than shallow across many
Two clouds, properly, with a formal partnership behind each. Not four, and not a logo wall of everything a client might ask about. The narrowing is what a firm this size can defend against consultancies a thousand times larger.
Engineers, not account managers
The person on the first call is the person who does the work. There is no layer between the people you brief and the people who write the change.
No number we cannot stand behind
This site once claimed nodes under management, uptime percentages and cutover success rates that nothing measured. They are gone. What remains — like the 847 workloads in one migration programme — is recorded where it was verified and stated nowhere else. A number nobody can defend is worse than no number.
How a piece of work runs
The same five steps whether it is a migration, a cluster or an agent in production.
A technical call
Forty-five minutes, free, no pitch. You describe what you are running and what worries you; we say what we would look at first and whether we are the right people at all.
Scope and assess
Before anything is proposed, we read the estate — applications, dependencies, identity, security controls, cost. What comes back is what we found and what we could not see, which is the half most assessments leave out.
Build
Landing zones, migration waves, clusters, pipelines, agents. Delivered in stages that each stand up on their own, so the work is useful before it is finished.
Operate together
Where we run it afterwards, we run it with your engineers rather than instead of them. No coverage hours or response times are published here; those belong in a signed agreement, not on a marketing page.
Hand over
Handover documents get filed and forgotten. Training does not. The last phase is your team working on the system with the engineers who built it, until they no longer need them.
The disciplines each step draws on are set out under services, the training in the last step under academy, and four engagements are written up as case studies — anonymised, with the clients' own figures.
Where we are
Warqline Technologies is registered in the Netherlands and has operated since 2025. The registered address is Taanmanstraat 5, 1502NA Zaandam, Netherlands — an administrative address rather than an office, so there is nothing to visit and we are not going to photograph a reception desk. The team is distributed and the work is remote, which is how it would be done anyway: the systems are in someone else's cloud account, and so are we.
The company is younger than the work. The engineers in it have been running production systems on AWS and Google Cloud for considerably longer, which is the experience the engagements draw on — and the reason this page argues from what has been shipped rather than from a founding date.
We work in English, across European and wider time zones. Registration details, KVK and VAT numbers and the trademark position are on the legal notice; how the site and its services handle data is on the Trust Center.
Want to know if we are the right people?
That is what the first call is for. Forty-five minutes with an engineer, no pitch, and a straight answer about whether this is work we should be doing.
Talk to an engineer